I thought we were coming to an end with the whole postmodernism idea but I guess I was wrong.. Anyways.. I think the gist of the article The Truth In Things by Jim Neilson would be that "The Things They Carried accords with much of the anti-totalizing strains of postmodernism, and [Neilson] will argue that it is precisely this tendency in his fiction that makes it incapable of opposing the ongoing reconstruction of the war as an American tragedy." It seems like O'Brien is trying to capture the essence of the similarities of the Vietnam war and the postmodern war. The "normal" American people are thought of to understand things better. Possibly like the elite discorse? According to Neilson, "O'Brien's concern is the attempt to reconcile fact and fiction, the real and imagined."
Neilson criticized the work by stating that "The weakness of The Things They Carried is that O'Brien's imagination is virtually the only reality. O'Brien does not contextualize his experience, does not provide us with any deeper understanding of the causes an consequences of this war, and does not see beyond his individual experience to document the vastly greater suffering of the Vietnamese. In doing so, O'Brien has constructed a test that, despite its radical aesthetic, largely reaffirms the prevailing ethnocentric conception of the war." I somewhat agree with this. I think O'Brien could have given us deeper understanding to make his book more effective and real.
"To many critics an theorists, the war cannot be represented adequately through traditional literary modes; only a postmodern aesthetic can convery something of the war's surreal, sense-shattering, media-inflected nature."
After I thought about Neilsons statement "for American literary culture the Vietnam War seems at times to have been waged more against totality that against the peoples of Indochina", I started to understand and agree with this statement. I believe that there indeed were more deaths of souls than there were lives.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Monday, February 1, 2010
TTTC
So far, I have enjoyed reading The Things They Carried. I have seen some reoccurring themes. I'm not completely sure how I will angle my essay or what theme and purpose I will go with to support my ideas, but I think if the themes I am beginning to see continue as I keep reading and exploring the book, I could possibly base my essay off of them.
Here they are:
1) The first and most obvious one is that all the soldiers are carrying extreme amounts of emotional baggage. Not only are the soldiers in each section carrying a bunch of stuff like different weapons, ponchos, jackets, sleeping stuff and what not but they are also carrying excess emotional baggage too. Each soldier has some kind of hidden secret. It could be love, grief, fear, or just the feeling of giving up. One soldier carries his girlfriends pantyhose with him, which is just a symbol of his love that he is carrying with him everyday. I'm sure more examples will come up in the novel as I continue reading.
2) Another possible theme idea could be how soldiers were forced to go to war when they did not want to be there. The narrator talks about how if he just shot off his toe he coul be transported in a helicopter back to the "real world". Instea of being in the action an anger all the time, he could just get it over with by hurting himself. However, no soldier would carry out this plan becasuse they would not want that reputation. They are looked at as brave men who are fighint for their country. If they went home on purpose, they would look like cowards to their fellow soldiers. This topic could be interesting because you could talk about differences between the raft and the freedom to choose to go to war.
3) One last idea I have is it really seems like the author makes it seem like war causes unwanted anger to all soldiers so they are constantly trying to find ways to release it. Almost like the author overreacts.
Well, those are a couple of topic ideas that I see happening in the book. If you have any more or anything to add please feel free.
Here they are:
1) The first and most obvious one is that all the soldiers are carrying extreme amounts of emotional baggage. Not only are the soldiers in each section carrying a bunch of stuff like different weapons, ponchos, jackets, sleeping stuff and what not but they are also carrying excess emotional baggage too. Each soldier has some kind of hidden secret. It could be love, grief, fear, or just the feeling of giving up. One soldier carries his girlfriends pantyhose with him, which is just a symbol of his love that he is carrying with him everyday. I'm sure more examples will come up in the novel as I continue reading.
2) Another possible theme idea could be how soldiers were forced to go to war when they did not want to be there. The narrator talks about how if he just shot off his toe he coul be transported in a helicopter back to the "real world". Instea of being in the action an anger all the time, he could just get it over with by hurting himself. However, no soldier would carry out this plan becasuse they would not want that reputation. They are looked at as brave men who are fighint for their country. If they went home on purpose, they would look like cowards to their fellow soldiers. This topic could be interesting because you could talk about differences between the raft and the freedom to choose to go to war.
3) One last idea I have is it really seems like the author makes it seem like war causes unwanted anger to all soldiers so they are constantly trying to find ways to release it. Almost like the author overreacts.
Well, those are a couple of topic ideas that I see happening in the book. If you have any more or anything to add please feel free.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
